New XKCD Forums

ease

Bingo bongo

Ratammer?

Domestos, killing 99% of them

some kind of control board with a weird fault

Title text: Subway refuses to answer my questions about whether it's an International Footlong or a US Survey Footlong. A milligram of sandwich is at stake!
Randall should contact Tom Scott, he already checked the length of a Subway sandwich

Thanks and also sorry for the delay, I went on holiday and didn't internet much. But now I'm back home and speaking of that, let's have a round of songs about coming/going home. Please get your songs home by the 7th of February

bigger fish (there's always one)

https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/fast_radio_bursts.png Title text: Dr. Petroff has also shown that the Higgs boson signal was actually sparks from someone microwaving grapes, the EHT black hole photo was a frozen bagel someone left in too long, and the LIGO detection was just someone slamming the micro...

I'm definitely not someone other than myself

The inverse of Fred?

I found some actual motivation to do things, so
/in

Guestronauts

Nope, it's a rather dynamic promotional poster for Trans Europ Express trains

Jplus wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2024 12:04 am Diana is ratammer, I think

I know Diana is ratammer, I was being silly.

Diana now?

A bank run

Jplus wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2024 12:03 am your imminent death

You overestimate my will to live

cat poison

(I have m doubts about a cat defeating rat poison, but we'll roll with it)

"bug thread" is just another way to say spider silk

My will to live

Is that me?

No.

Jplus?

High quality earplugs

Somi this time

Fred?

Mountainclimbers watch in horror as I tie two ropes together using a lineman splice

condensation

https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/supernova.png Title text: They're a little cagey about exactly where the crossover point lies relative to the likelihood of devastating effects on the planet. I'm sure the similarity between this and the Lennard-Jones potential isn't a coincidence, but a clue to some fu...

Yes, I am

RMS

ratammer wrote:

somitomi wrote:How about an acoustic round?

You've already had it

We've had one, yes. What about second acoustic round?